In a recent interview on Newstalk 107.9, Representative Mike Veile (R-District 35) discussed his transition into the Idaho Legislature and outlined his positions on several high-profile issues from the recent session. Appointed by the governor to fill the vacancy left by former Representative Andrus, Veile is now campaigning for his first full term representing the district, which includes Soda Springs and surrounding areas.
Veile addressed his stance on education, specifically his opposition to House Bill 93. While expressing support for parental choice, the Republican legislator argued that using state funds for private entities is inefficient. “We have a strong public system that we want to fund, but if everybody has their own system, then we’re dispersing limited resources inefficiently,” Veile said. He noted that his background as a former school board member influenced his perspective on the importance of maintaining a well-funded public education system.
Regarding immigration, Veile proposed a three-point strategy focused on border security, employment verification, and federal guest worker reform. He emphasized the necessity of year-round worker programs for Idaho’s dairy industry, which he described as a $3 billion cornerstone of the state economy. Veile indicated support for verification systems for large entities with the “bandwidth” to implement them, though he expressed concern regarding potential government overreach in private hiring for small, individual services.
During the interview, hosts Neal Larson and Julie Mason questioned Veile regarding his attendance at a fundraising dinner hosted by pro-choice activists. Veile characterized the event as a “learning moment” for a political newcomer. He explained that he accepted the invitation to discuss rural healthcare challenges and the “Whammy” program, which helps Idaho students secure medical school seats. Despite the controversy surrounding the fundraiser, Veile reaffirmed his pro-life values, stating his position is rooted in his faith and alignment with the Idaho Defense of Life Act.
The representative also defended his vote against a bill targeting teacher union taxpayer resources. Veile argued that the fiscal impact of the bill was minimal and expressed concern that such legislation could negatively affect teacher morale. Looking ahead, Veile cited water rights, public land access, and the preservation of local control as his primary priorities for District 35.
