FULL DEBATE VIDEO: Bingham vs McKellar – District 32B

FULL VIDEO BELOW

In a legislative debate hosted by Neal Larson and Julie Mason on Newstalk 107.9, incumbent Representative Erin Bingham and challenger Brian McKellar presented differing visions for Idaho House District 32B. The primary contest highlights a contrast between Bingham’s recent record as an appointee and McKellar’s platform as a “conservative businessman” seeking to give voters an elected choice.

A primary point of contention was state-level immigration enforcement. Bingham defended her votes against several enforcement bills, including House Bill 700 regarding E-Verify. She argued the legislation created “unfunded mandates” for local governments and potentially violated the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. McKellar countered that the bill was a “no-nonsense” approach to employer accountability. He suggested that legal channels, such as H1-B visas, are sufficient for industries like agriculture and emphasized the need for tougher state enforcement.

The candidates also diverged on education and House Bill 93, a landmark parental tax credit bill. While Bingham identifies as a supporter of school choice, she explained her opposition to the bill was based on a lack of fiscal oversight and “guardrails.” McKellar gave an enthusiastic endorsement of the program, noting that 13,000 children have already enrolled. He argued that traditional educational methods are no longer sufficient and that the high demand for the tax credit proves it is a priority for Idaho families.

Regarding the state budget, Bingham criticized the legislature’s recent “across-the-board” cuts of 4-5%, advocating instead for a line-item approach to ensure essential services like fire suppression and transportation remain funded. McKellar pointed to Medicaid expansion as a primary area for potential savings, arguing the program has been “abused” and should be reconsidered to protect funds for the elderly and disabled.

In her closing remarks, Bingham pivoted to public safety, detailing her efforts to regulate Kratom, which she referred to as “gas station fentanyl.” McKellar concluded by emphasizing the “appointee versus elected” narrative, stating that the voters of Bonneville County deserve to choose their own representative. The primary election is scheduled for May 19.

Bingham v. McKellar Part 1:


Bingham v. McKellar Part 2:

scroll to top