INTERVIEW: Senator Crapo on Economic Policy, SOTU, National Politics">INTERVIEW: Senator Crapo on Economic Policy, SOTU, National Politics

INTERVIEW: Senator Crapo on Economic Policy, SOTU, National Politics">

Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) provided a wide-ranging assessment of the current national political landscape in a recent interview with Neal Larson and Julie Mason from Newstalk 107.9. The Senator offered his perspective on President Trump’s State of the Union address, praising the speech for its focus on economic achievements, the Working Families Tax Cut Act, and efforts toward border security. Crapo described the opening portion of the address as particularly effective in detailing the administration’s progress, despite what he characterized as immediate dismissals from the media.

Regarding the environment during the address, Crapo noted a shift in decorum, observing that there were fewer disruptions compared to previous years. He characterized the Democratic presence as a “quiet resistance,” noting that most members remained silent and refrained from applauding except for moments of bipartisan consensus, such as honoring Medal of Honor recipients. During the interview, Crapo also addressed the President’s comments regarding Congressional “insider trading.” While the Senator noted that the STOCK Act already prohibits such activity, he expressed support for further legislative measures to tighten regulations on members of Congress to ensure transparency and accountability.

The Senator also discussed the President’s challenge to attendees regarding immigration, where the President asked those who believe the government should protect American citizens first to stand. Crapo interpreted this as a direct confrontation with policies that have led to what he described as “explosive immigration.” He further suggested that the Democratic Party’s current internal dynamics are influenced by deep-seated opposition to the former president, leading to a perceived disconnect between their policy platforms and the general public’s preferences.

Turning to financial matters, Crapo—a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee—commented on reports of JP Morgan closing President Trump’s accounts. He categorized this as part of a broader “debanking” trend where financial institutions target individuals or industries based on political or ideological disagreements. Crapo compared these actions to previous administrative efforts to pressure banks against the firearms industry. He argued for stricter prohibitions against politically motivated financial exclusions, acknowledging the “fuzzy line” banks often use between legitimate risk assessment and regulatory risk to justify such actions.

On the topic of trade, Crapo addressed the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn certain tariffs implemented under emergency powers. While he expressed disappointment, he noted that the administration intended to utilize other statutory authorities to maintain trade pressure. Crapo defended the use of tariffs as a tool to ensure fair trade and stimulate domestic capital formation, job growth, and higher wages. He countered arguments that tariffs serve primarily as a burden on consumers, stating that those analyses often ignore the broader economic benefits of robust trade policies.

2.24.2026 – Legislative Scrutiny, Political Corrosion, Enduring Trauma">2.24.2026 – Legislative Scrutiny, Political Corrosion, Enduring Trauma

2.24.2026 – Legislative Scrutiny, Political Corrosion, Enduring Trauma">

Send a text

This episode kicks off with Neal and Julie looking ahead to tonight’s State of the Union, where the President’s “America 250” theme is set to intertwine with discussions on pressing issues like tariffs, the economy, and Iran. Locally, the Idaho legislative session is a major focus. We hear their take on Senator Harris’s e-verify bill, which they critically analyze for potentially offering more exemptions than enforcement, raising questions about transparency in legislation. The “blood bill,” allowing self-directed donations, sparks a deep dive into the Red Cross’s financial practices, including its substantial revenue from blood sales and CEO’s salary, prompting a broader discussion on personal freedom versus business interests. They also touch on the peculiar opposition to a rat eradication bill from exterminators, and a controversial emergency bill by Britt Raybould that could retroactively change candidate residency requirements, drawing concern for its potential to disqualify challengers like David Worley and protect incumbents.

Beyond the legislative arena, the hosts don’t shy away from national political commentary. They dissect Gavin Newsom’s “960 SAT guy” comment and his subsequent social media “double down,” critiquing what they perceive as a lack of genuine apology and an attempt to deflect. This segues into a broader, heartfelt discussion on how politics, particularly amplified by social media, can corrode individuals’ emotional well-being and foster an overly polarized “hero or villain” mentality in society. A particularly moving segment explores the lasting impact of crime, spurred by their review of “The Scream Murders” documentary on the Cassie Joe Stoddart case, and features a powerful call from a listener sharing her own family’s tragic experience with murder, highlighting the unending pain for victims’ families and the complexities of juvenile sentencing. The show concludes with lighter notes on digital driver’s licenses and the power dynamics of international oil seizures, always circling back to the importance of honesty and substance in public discourse.

**Highlight List:**
*   **Idaho Legislative Battlegrounds:** Critical analysis of controversial bills concerning immigration (e-verify), blood donation (Red Cross’s business model), and candidate residency (potential incumbent protection).
*   **Politics, Personal Erosion, and Social Media:** Discussion on Gavin Newsom’s gaffe, leading to a broader critique of how extreme political engagement, fueled by social media, can negatively impact individuals’ emotional health and societal discourse.
*   **The Unending Trauma of Crime:** A poignant segment discussing the Cassie Joe Stoddert murder documentary and a listener’s personal testimony, emphasizing the long-term suffering of victims’ families and the difficult questions around justice for youthful offenders.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Read More

Rexburg native loses contact with family caught in “El Mencho” fallout in Mexico">Rexburg native loses contact with family caught in “El Mencho” fallout in Mexico

Rexburg native loses contact with family caught in “El Mencho” fallout in Mexico">

REXBURG, Idaho (KIFI)– Violence has erupted across several areas in Mexico, and there are still a lot of unknowns about what’s going on. A local Rexburg woman tells Local News 8 she has family stuck there. Abigahil Luna of Rexburg learned that her father and grandmother are caught in the center of the chaos sparked from the recent killing of the top drug lord, “El Mencho.

Luna shares with local news 8 videos sent to her from her dad of buildings in flames and the mass discussion he witnessed. In one of the videos, you can see the stock room of a grocery store in perfect condition, and in another video, taken shortly after, shows the store in ashes. This was a store her family was staying near by.

“It went from 1 P.M to having a great grocery store to 1 A.M., and it’s burned up,” said Luna. “I don’t know if my family is okay. My grandma’s over there. She’s actually, like, two minutes from that grocery store. And so, you know, it’s a little scary.”

Normal communication and ways to send financial support have been cut off. 

“My Dad asked me for money yesterday, and I haven’t actuallyn’t heard a response from him at all since, like, 3 P.M. yesterday,” said Luna.

This is the last photo Luna got from her Father. Not knowing what is happening to her family, Luna can only hope for the best, knowing what’s at stake.

“If my grandma were to go out there right now, she probably would get shot up. That’s how scary it is right now for them,” said Luna.

While she has family in Mexico, Luna was born in Idaho. She wants her community to know why this is such a special place for her and her family. 

“This is why people come to the United States. They fear what we’re going through right now. That happens all the time,” said Luna.

WATCH LIVE: President Trump to deliver State of the Union Address">WATCH LIVE: President Trump to deliver State of the Union Address

WATCH LIVE: President Trump to deliver State of the Union Address">

President Donald Trump will deliver his 2026 State of the Union Address to a joint session of Congress and to millions of Americans from home. The address is expected to begin at 7 p.m. MT.

The theme of tonight’s address will be “America at 250: Strong, Prosperous and Respected,” according to White House officials familiar with a draft of the speech.

“A large portion of the speech will, yes, focus on the economy. The president will lay out the case for why he and Republicans are better suited to tackle, continue tackling the affordability crisis that was created by the Biden administration and Democrats on Capitol Hill,” Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary said.

“It’s going to be a long speech,” President Trump said. “We have so much to talk about.”

The official Democratic Party response will come from Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, whose speech from Colonial Williamsburg is likely to address protecting American Democracy as the country approaches its 250th birthday.

Spanberger, who swept into the governor’s mansion last year after a 15-point win, offered what many Democrats hope is a preview of a winning election season. She said she would address “rising costs, chaos in their communities, and a real fear of what each day might bring.”

scroll to top