Former Idaho State Representative Chad Christensen is seeking a return to the legislature, outlining a platform focused on welfare reform, Second Amendment rights, and stricter sentencing for sex offenders. Speaking in an interview on Newstalk 107.9 with hosts Neal Larson and Julie Mason, Christensen discussed his motivations for running for Seat 35A and how he plans to adjust his approach if elected.
Christensen, who previously served in the House, identified welfare fraud as a top priority for the upcoming legislative session. He proposed moving the state’s welfare fraud investigation unit to the Attorney General’s office to ensure greater oversight and independence. Christensen argued that the current administration of the Department of Health and Welfare has hampered the unit’s ability to operate effectively, citing his own professional background as a fraud investigator from 2007 to 2011.
On the topic of public safety, Christensen stated he intends to introduce legislation that eliminates probation or “riders” for certain sexual convictions, opting instead for mandatory minimum sentences. He also reaffirmed his commitment to expanding firearm rights, specifically advocating for “Stand Your Ground” laws, the “castle doctrine,” and legislation allowing for school carry to eliminate what he described as “soft targets” for criminals. He expressed frustration with Senate leadership, claiming good legislation is often “put in a drawer” without a fair hearing.
During the interview, Christensen addressed his reputation for being a combative figure in Boise. When asked by Neal Larson and Julie Mason if a more diplomatic approach might be more effective, Christensen acknowledged that he had matured since his previous term. He noted that while he remains passionate about his core beliefs regarding the Constitution and God-given rights, he recognizes the value of being more strategic. “I’ve matured a little more, I guess, from when I was in office the first time,” Christensen said, suggesting he might use a more diplomatic approach rather than “ramming the front door” as he had in the past.
Christensen also drew a sharp contrast between himself and his opponent, Mike Veile. He criticized Veile’s voting record and alleged that his opponent was too liberal for the district, citing low “freedom scores” and attendance at events hosted by pro-choice organizations. Christensen concluded by expressing concern over the current layout of District 35, which he claimed was gerrymandered to impact his previous re-election efforts.
