EXCLUSIVE Rep. Marco Erickson on LD 33B re-election bid">EXCLUSIVE Rep. Marco Erickson on LD 33B re-election bid

EXCLUSIVE Rep. Marco Erickson on LD 33B re-election bid">

In a recent interview on Newstalk 107.9, Idaho State Representative Marco Erickson (R-Idaho Falls) reflected on the challenges of the latest legislative session and outlined his priorities as he faces a primary challenge from Jilene Burger. Erickson, who has served six years in the legislature, addressed recent controversies and his shift toward data-driven policy making.

During the discussion, Erickson commented on the legislative tactic known as “radiator capping,” where committee chairs or leadership significantly alter or stall bills. He noted the frustration that arises when legislation with broad support is blocked. Erickson shared a personal example of a bill he sponsored that carried 35 Senate votes but was held up by a committee chairman. Despite these procedural hurdles, Erickson expressed optimism about his future role in the House, noting that his seniority and experience as a vice chair for four years may lead to a committee chairmanship in the next session.

The interview also touched upon Erickson’s voting record and a specific incident where his substitute, Kirk Larsen, cast a vote on a bill that received national attention while Erickson was away. Erickson clarified that while he might have voted differently, substitutes are granted full voting rights. He defended his overall conservative record, citing data analytics that show he aligns with the Republican majority between 87% and 95% of the time, depending on the metrics used. He argued that his occasional votes against the party often stem from concerns over the legislative process rather than the content of the bills.

Looking ahead, Erickson highlighted his ongoing work regarding prison reform and mental health. He emphasized a desire to reduce Idaho’s female incarceration rates by implementing “step-up” systems between the courts and prisons. Erickson, who holds a master’s degree and has a background in treatment services, stated that his goal is to improve treatment quality “upstream” to reduce long-term state spending and recidivism.

Erickson concluded by pointing voters to his social media for campaign updates, as he has moved away from a traditional website. His challenger, Jilene Burger, is scheduled to be interviewed on Newstalk 107.9 tomorrow morning to provide her perspective on the race.

4.22.2026 – DEBATE – Rep. Rod Furniss and Karey Hanks- Immigration Bills, Education, Spending">4.22.2026 – DEBATE – Rep. Rod Furniss and Karey Hanks- Immigration Bills, Education, Spending

4.22.2026 – DEBATE – Rep. Rod Furniss and Karey Hanks- Immigration Bills, Education, Spending">

Send us Fan Mail

Today’s show was a mix of pre-debate commentary and a full-on District 31 rematch debate between Representative Rod Furniss and former Representative Karey Hanks. Before the candidates came in, we previewed the format (including a little “AI gotcha question” twist), then pivoted into two big statewide punching bags: allegations involving the Southern Poverty Law Center (framed as manufacturing racist incidents for fundraising/narrative purposes), and the Idaho Education Association’s “no confidence” vote against Governor Brad Little after he signed a bill stopping unions from using taxpayer-funded resources for union activity. We also briefly hit some local-life stuff—rain helping lawns, and a plug for the four-step lawn program and spring planting at Country Garden.

In the debate itself, Furniss and Hanks drew sharp contrasts on immigration enforcement, education policy (House Bill 93, Launch, school budgeting), and state spending. Hanks pushed a hard line on illegal immigration (including opposition to non-emergency benefits for illegal immigrants) and framed Furniss as too aligned with special interests and bigger-government policies like Medicaid expansion. Furniss defended his record as a practical conservative—focused on budgets, fiscal notes, and avoiding unfunded mandates that would land on property taxpayers—and argued Idaho needs workable federal tools (like reforming H-2A into a 12‑month program) to actually solve the labor/legal workforce problem. Education turned into a back-and-forth over HB 93 accountability, Launch’s effectiveness and guardrails, and whether districts with large reserves should still be treated as “cash-poor” during tight budget years. The debate closed with pointed cross-questions, including disagreement over what “conservative” even means in practice—votes, governance style, and who each candidate is really listening to.

### Highlights
– Debate preview included an AI-generated “gotcha question” segment, plus candidate-to-candidate questions at the end.  
– Immigration clash: enforcement bills, E‑Verify concerns, H‑2A reforms, and whether state bills create unfunded mandates that raise property taxes.  
– Education flashpoints: House Bill 93 (school choice tax credit), Launch program accountability, teacher pay pressures, and school district reserve funds.  
– Spending argument: what counts as a “cut,” how federal vs state dollars affect totals, and the long-term effects of ARPA and Medicaid expansion.  
– Political identity divide: “citizen legislator” vs “experienced budget writer,” plus fights over IFF influence and voting alignment.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Read More

4.22.2026 – DEBATE – Rep. Rod Furniss and Karey Hanks- Immigration Bills, Education, Spending">4.22.2026 – DEBATE – Rep. Rod Furniss and Karey Hanks- Immigration Bills, Education, Spending

4.22.2026 – DEBATE – Rep. Rod Furniss and Karey Hanks- Immigration Bills, Education, Spending">

Send us Fan Mail

Today’s show was a mix of pre-debate commentary and a full-on District 31 rematch debate between Representative Rod Furniss and former Representative Karey Hanks. Before the candidates came in, we previewed the format (including a little “AI gotcha question” twist), then pivoted into two big statewide punching bags: allegations involving the Southern Poverty Law Center (framed as manufacturing racist incidents for fundraising/narrative purposes), and the Idaho Education Association’s “no confidence” vote against Governor Brad Little after he signed a bill stopping unions from using taxpayer-funded resources for union activity. We also briefly hit some local-life stuff—rain helping lawns, and a plug for the four-step lawn program and spring planting at Country Garden.

In the debate itself, Furniss and Hanks drew sharp contrasts on immigration enforcement, education policy (House Bill 93, Launch, school budgeting), and state spending. Hanks pushed a hard line on illegal immigration (including opposition to non-emergency benefits for illegal immigrants) and framed Furniss as too aligned with special interests and bigger-government policies like Medicaid expansion. Furniss defended his record as a practical conservative—focused on budgets, fiscal notes, and avoiding unfunded mandates that would land on property taxpayers—and argued Idaho needs workable federal tools (like reforming H-2A into a 12‑month program) to actually solve the labor/legal workforce problem. Education turned into a back-and-forth over HB 93 accountability, Launch’s effectiveness and guardrails, and whether districts with large reserves should still be treated as “cash-poor” during tight budget years. The debate closed with pointed cross-questions, including disagreement over what “conservative” even means in practice—votes, governance style, and who each candidate is really listening to.

### Highlights
– Debate preview included an AI-generated “gotcha question” segment, plus candidate-to-candidate questions at the end.  
– Immigration clash: enforcement bills, E‑Verify concerns, H‑2A reforms, and whether state bills create unfunded mandates that raise property taxes.  
– Education flashpoints: House Bill 93 (school choice tax credit), Launch program accountability, teacher pay pressures, and school district reserve funds.  
– Spending argument: what counts as a “cut,” how federal vs state dollars affect totals, and the long-term effects of ARPA and Medicaid expansion.  
– Political identity divide: “citizen legislator” vs “experienced budget writer,” plus fights over IFF influence and voting alignment.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Read More

ISU Dance Company to Host First Showcase">ISU Dance Company to Host First Showcase

ISU Dance Company to Host First Showcase">

POCATELLO, Idaho (KIFI) – Each week, a dedicated group of ISU student dancers files into the Red Hill building on campus to rehearse solos, duets and group routines for their upcoming showcase. Just a few short months ago, the dance company didn’t exist at all.

“About two years ago they had a smaller bit of this dance club,” said Paige Robinson, the club vice president. “When it was about to be discontinued, we about lost all of our funds until Blue stepped up and said, ‘hey, we want to bring dance back.'”

The group formed through random connections and ISU-offered dance courses. They went through the process to ratify a club constitution, elect leadership, and get the company officially recognized by the university. They were told they had just under $1000 to get off the ground.

Then, on this year’s Bengal Giving Day, generous donors got that budget up to $8000. Now, the athletes are rehearsing for their first ever showcase, to be held at the Stephen’s Performing Arts Center on Monday, May 4 at 6:30 p.m.

“ISU Dance Company is a club dedicated to allowing students to continue their passion of dance,” said Blue Hill, the club president. “It is also the student led replacement of the dance program as the minor got cut last spring, and the major got cut a while before.”

The club is offering students a place to begin a new craft, continue honing in their skills and simply to have fun in a hobby. The best part of the club is that anyone is welcome.

“We wanted to make something for all levels,” said Cassidy Barrow, the club treasurer. “So you don’t have to be like, you know, really extremely well at dance. You can be an intermediate or beginner dancer and still have fun with it.”

The concert will be free with Bengal ID for ISU students and faculty, while community members will pay $5 for a ticket at the door. The concert will feature over 15 unique performances by the 22 members of the company. Each piece is entirely choreographed by the student dancers.

“Me and Blue are choreographing most of the group dances, and then everyone has their own solo they’re in charge of,” said Robinson.

The dancers are working hard in rehearsals for the upcoming weeks until the performance. Barrow says this is the first opportunity for the athletes to showcase their passion and talents with a live audience, especially since the club is so new.

“We put a lot of work into all of our dances that we are performing,” Barrow said. “ISU students that have joined, they kind of found a love for dance again and everyone has really enjoyed this club. And so we’re hoping to share that with the audience.”

 To keep up with the ISU Dance Company or for more information about joining, you can find them on Instagram at ISU Dance Company.

scroll to top